Whether it’s an unsuitable comment at work place or a jeering from a passing car, sexual objectification of women can cause anxiety about personal safety, hypervigilance toward appearance and severe threats to overall well-being.
As part of an effort to get rid of the rise of this global pandemic, an international study led by Western University, University of Kent, The Ohio State University and Colorado College is providing the tools necessary to properly explore and understand these mental and potentially physical harms to women.
“Sexual objectification occurs when a woman’s body, body parts, or sexual functions are isolated from her whole and complex being and treated as objects simply to be looked at, coveted, or touched”, said Fredickson Roberts.
A professor who specializes in social and personality psycology, Rachel Calogero, and her collaborators have recently developed a new research tool that confirmed the proposed links between experiences of sexual objectification and feeling anxious about personal safety.
According to the professor, these experiences pile up over time and create worry and concern about being harmed. Sexual objectification not only carries with it the threat of physical harm but also the violation of personal boundaries.
The researchers produced a tool consisting of eight questions about feelings of personal safety in an individual’s everyday environment. It helps researchers, like Calogero, identity the degree of personal safety anxiety experiences across different groups of people and in what contexts it is magnified or muted.
She further said that this tool gives us a better understanding of the extent to which sociocultural factors like sexual objectification end up shaping and limiting how women can safely live their lives.
The findings, were recently published by Journal of Personality and Social Psychology is based in large part on objectification theory, which was developed in the 1990s, to explain how routine and unwanted sexual objectification affects women’s psychological, emotional, and physical well-being.
The professor said this theory proposes recurrent sexual objectification of women through interpersonal (sexualized appearance commentary, groping, ogling) and media (objectified portrayals of women in film, TV and literature) encounters can lead women to view themselves more as sexual objects.
Calogero said that women become hyper vigilant about their appearance and expect to be judged based on how they look, which can have a number of negative consequences over time, adding that more than two decades of research supports the connection between recurrent sexual objectification and poorer mental health in women.
She also stated that citing eating disorders and depression as examples of potential impacts on well-being.
In addition to making women more worried and concerned about their appearance, according to her, the theory proposes that being sexually objectified also increases women’s worry and concern about their safety, because sexual objectification in all its forms carries the potential for physical harm with the extreme end of the sexual objectification continuum being assault and rape.
For further investigation, Calogero and her colleagues considered women and men based in North America using a variety of measures that have been validated to assess experiences of sexual objectification, subjective well-being, and mental health.
Across multiple independent studies, more frequent experiences of sexual objectification predicted more personal safety anxiety in women, which was linked to more engagement in precautionary behaviors and restricting their movement to stay safe.
She said that the findings suggest that men experience personal safety anxiety as well but not to the same degree or in the same way as women.
“The statistical modeling suggests that men’s personal safety anxiety may actually look different than women’s when they do experience it,” said Calogero. “It would be important to examine what sociocultural contexts and forces may be operating uniquely for men in relation to their personal safety anxiety. It is also important to note our samples were predominantly white, cisgender, heterosexual women and men, which means the findings are limited to these populations at the moment.”
